Articles

Today, we hear the term 24/7 quite a bit, a few years ago you would have looked at me blankly if I had used it in the pulpit. 24/7 simply means 24 hours a day 7 days a week and it is often used to describe the 21^st century culture we now live in. No longer can the week be divided into the five day working week and the two day weekend off. Life today tends to be more of a continuum of work, leisure and sleep. For many there is not a specific weekend or day off and the concept of Sunday as the Sabbath Day of rest is long gone. As Dame Maggie Smith said as her dowager duchess character in Downton Abbey; ‘What is a weekend?’ And it is a good question!

We live in a society that never sleeps. Did you know that a few years ago Edinburgh had the greatest number of call centres and call operators in the UK, if not in Europe? These call centres operate 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. Which means that should you wish to check your bank account or pay bills at 0300 on a Wednesday morning you can?

The life we live today in 2022 is strikingly different to the way in which we lived life during my childhood in the late 60’s and early 70’s, as it will be very different to the way life was lived when you were children. Yet, it does not depress me. In order to live and survive in today’s world one has to be realistic and accepting of the changes in one’s pattern of life. Bemoaning that; ‘Things are not what they used to be’ gets you nowhere. It does not mean, however, that like a lemming you have to follow the crowd; you can challenge the status quo and strike out on your own, establishing your way of doing things but don’t expect too many others to copy you. Challenging the status quo is, however, a good thing to do at times, as it can be life-changing and energising.

I have a great respect for all those who seek to challenge the accepted norms, especially where those norms do don’t benefit others. Think of those who champion the underdog, the poor, and the forgotten. Those who fight to change attitudes towards those who society tries to marginalise such as: asylum seekers, the disabled, those from the LGBTI+ community. Progress may be slow but I believe they will succeed because right is on their side. I have no respect, though, for those who try to dictate to us what we are to believe, say or do; for example extreme political or religious groups. I also have little sympathy for those who moan about the changes to Sunday - why?

It is not because I do not believe that Sundays are special I do but I also recognise that for the majority of the population Sundays are not special days off, they can be working days and busy days ferrying family to one event after another. For many people Sundays are certainly not a Sabbath or a day of rest. I am a realist, we are never going to have shops closed on Sundays again but as a Christian I believe that we should encourage everyone to keep a ‘Sabbath’. To find new ways of applying the old concept because if a day of rest was good enough for God then it is good enough for God’s creation too. How can we 21^st century believers redefine the ‘Sabbath’ concept for today’s society?

Firstly, we need to encourage everyone to have at least a day off during the week, to keep a Sabbath but not necessarily on a Sunday. This also challenges the church to look to itself and the days on which it offers worship, if Sunday is not the best day for some people when do we need to have our churches open and to invite people to join us?

My personal ’Sabbath’ tends to be a Friday, if not some other day depending on my diary. I always try to have a day off, (even if now the SEC encourages us to have two days off!). It is a chance to slow down and to rest. For me Sundays are a day of work and tend to be quite full – it might be the same for you.

Choosing when to keep ‘a Sabbath’ is not a new concept. The early Christians chose Sunday as a time to celebrate the resurrection of Jesus, in contrast to their Jewish neighbours who kept the Sabbath on Saturday. Followers of Islam keep Friday as special. The common thing here is that a day is kept as sacred time, a day to rest and pray, to relax and to give thanks to God. It is, I think, less important what day is kept as the Sabbath than the fact that a Sabbath Day is kept.

In today’s Gospel reading the leader of the synagogue chastises Jesus for healing on the Sabbath:

There are six days in which work ought to be done, come on those days and be cured, and not on the Sabbath.”

Jesus responded in telling the official that he is wrong, for even the scriptures tell you that you may work on the Sabbath when you need to, where it states that you may lead your ass to water. What Jesus is actually saying is one should not be hidebound to the law, that it is not there to dictate to you but to help you organise your life and society around. He implies that the law has to be flexible to needs and the local environment or else the whole thing will collapse. If the ass did not drink on the Sabbath then it would die and allow no work to happen in the coming week. Jesus was always concerned with the welfare of others and was prepared to challenge the status quo, where it would be harmful. In seeing the crippled woman in pain, Jesus seeks to help her thereby putting the needs of God’s people above the letter of the law.

We are told to keep a Sabbath after six days of work but we are not told specifically which day to keep as the Sabbath. It depends on which day you start your six days of work. The theologian Jurgen Moltmann wrote about 40 years ago that it is vitally important to keep the Sabbath, a whole 24 hours in which things can slow down and God can be given some quality time. It is good advice and advice we all in today’s society need to hear and respond to.

Keep your Sabbath special would I think a better campaign that one trying to keep Sundays alone as special. As you will gather by now, I do not mourn the passing of the old Sundays. As a youngster I hated them and found them depressing. Just when I had some time and energy to do things, places were shut. As the Church we need to continually discern how we can best serve God’s people in this 24/7 culture. We need to recognise that for many Sunday is not their Sabbath and that 10 am on Sunday might not be the best time to go to church either.

We are being challenged by society to bring Christ into the world as it is today. It is a challenge we cannot afford to ignore, for if we do we are doing God, Christ and God’s people a disservice. Whatever day you keep as your Sabbath, enjoy it. Encourage your family, friends and neighbours to do the same and nag the church to do something about it too.

Yesterday, the Edinburgh International Book Festival began. I feel sure that many of you will have happy memories of sitting in a very warm marquee in the middle of Charlotte Square and listening to distinguished speakers. Festivals of this and of all kinds should be peaceful and reflective events, open to a variety of perspectives. The vicious and life-threatening assault on Salman Rushdie at the Chautauqua Institute on Friday has been rightly and unequivocally condemned by many people.

It seems likely, given what is known about the alleged attacker, that he was motivated by an extreme and distorted version of his religious beliefs. That has, predictably, led to widespread comment on social media that the world would be a better and safer place if there were no religious believers. Some of that comment is reasoned, some of it is a reminder that secularists can be surprisingly intolerant, uncharitable and prone to sweeping generalisations.

In the light of all this, today’s Gospel makes particularly difficult reading. It’s one of those moments in the New Testament when we seem to have direct access to Jesus’ emotions. He confronts us with some powerful and very challenging words:

“Do you think that I have come to bring peace to the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division!”

And Matthew’s Gospel has an even starker version of this saying:

"Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.”

A few years ago, Susan and I went to a brilliant talk at the Book Festival by the historian Sir David Cannadine, and it came to mind when I looked at today’s challenging and uncompromising Gospel, because Sir David referred to it in his lecture.

Professor Cannadine also quoted that verse from Matthew but went on to suggest that it is essential to hold it in dialogue with other sayings of Jesus, including his teaching about loving your enemy and about turning the other cheek. And as we think about today’s Gospel, it is important to remember something that Jesus says a little earlier in Chapter 12 of Luke:

"Do not be afraid, little flock, for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom.”

We value family life, delighting in its closeness if we are privileged to enjoy it and mourning deeply when family ties are broken by death, yet here is Jesus saying that his mission – the inauguration of the Kingdom of God - will divide families, setting close relatives against each other. On the face of it, this seems to add weight to the Humanist view of that religion is a bad thing precisely because it causes divisions and hatred, and that the world would be better off without it.

This hard saying of Jesus is an example of him deliberately challenging the values, the comfort zones of the culture in which he lived. Elsewhere in the Gospels, he challenges other values – the commerce that sustained Temple worship, material possessions, ritual purity, racial prejudice and militant nationalism. The challenges are never negative – Jesus is always saying, and showing in his own life, that God has something better to offer than the comfort zones – social, economic, cultural, ideological and, indeed, religious – that we humans create for ourselves.

In the case of family life, we need to remember that in those days there was no welfare state, and that the family was the social security system. Those excluded from family life found themselves isolated and impoverished. The better way that Jesus taught and lived was to engage lovingly with people outside the comfortable mutually-supportive unit of the family, loving them and sharing table fellowship with them.

And then there’s the dramatic beginning of today’s Gospel

“I came to bring fire to the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled.”

Those words have often been understood as referring to God’s judgement, but Fire has other meanings in the Bible. It is sometimes an indicator of the presence of God – remember the burning bush that Moses saw, or the pillar of fire that led the Hebrew people through the wilderness by night, or the tongues of flame at Pentecost. And Fire is also seen in the Bible as a symbol of God’s intention to purify his people – think of those verses in the prophet Malachi:

“For he is like a refiner's fire…”

We should think of Jesus as God present among God’s people, seeking to purify and perfect, yet agonizingly aware that he will be despised and rejected.

Faith, these readings suggest, need not be a cause of tension and violence. One of the themes of David Cannadine’s lecture was that for much of history people of different faiths have managed to live peacefully alongside each other and to benefit from a mutual exchange of ideas and culture. It’s worth remembering the role that Muslim scholars played in the Middle Ages in preserving the best of Greek Philosophy, Science and Mathematics and making them accessible to the Christian West. St Thomas Aquinas was significantly influenced by the Jewish scholar Moses Maimonides and by the Muslim thinker known in the west as Averroes, whose real name was Ibn Rushd and who taught that if we don’t engage critically and thoughtfully with your religious beliefs, their true meaning may be lost and we may fall into dangerous misunderstanding of God’s purposes for us.

Ibn Rushd was surely right. If faith becomes rooted in comforting human certainties, if it ceases to be self-critical, then it ceases to be faith and becomes ideology. It loses the openness to God’s gifts and to God’s purposes and becomes aggressive or defensive, and it diminishes into the conviction that the world would be better place if everyone believed and behaved just like us. Religious believers often fall into that trap, but then so do Humanists. If, on the other hand, faith is based on a recognition of the challenging generosity of God to all God’s creation, then faith becomes a willingness to move beyond the safe, the familiar and the convenient and to seek the justice and righteousness of the Kingdom of God.

It is that sort of faith of which, in the words of today’s Epistle, Jesus is “the pioneer and perfecter”. Jesus had not come to validate the divisions which we human beings are so good at creating for ourselves. Rather he came to destroy those divisions by showing the generosity of God, to encourage us out of our brokenness, our fear of others, our love of power into a new creation.

Which prompts the thought that what the world needs is not the triumph of secular Humanism, nor the triumph of one of the political ideologies into which religions so easily deteriorate – whether its Conservative Evangelicals supporting Donald Trump in the USA, radical Islamist terrorists in the Middle East or those who believe that showing disrespect to their religious beliefs should carry a death sentence  – rather what the world needs is more real faith. Real faith is costly and difficult. To live it to the full, as Jesus did, means challenging the comforting certainties of the human structures and ideologies that divide people from each other, and discovering that our comfort zone can be far, far bigger than we realized.

Faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1)

When did  you last put your faith in some one or something?  It may have been getting on an aeroplane trusting that we would land safely. It may have been going to see a hospital consultant and awaiting a longed for diagnosis. It may have been visiting a friend hoping for a particular outcome or response.  Think for a moment. How did we feel? How did we react?  Perhaps slightly uncertain, anxious, troubled and even vulnerable.

Our readings today are all about putting our trust in God without always knowing what the outcome will be.  Of having to trust despite what we are being told or what seems most likely to be a foregone conclusion. Abraham longed for Sarah, his wife, to bear a son and heir. It seemed impossible. Yet God brought him outside and said “Look toward heaven and count the stars.  So shall your descendants be”.

Did you notice the word most repeated in our readings?  “Faith”. It  is repeated at least seven times in Hebrews. The other repeated words are “Do not be afraid”.  Faith and anxiety seem to co-exist. They never quite disappear. There seems to be an ongoing tension and even struggle.

In the book entitled “Glimpses of the Divine” the German artist and catholic priest, Sieger Koder (1925-2015)  captured something of the hidden God in the everydayness of life through his paintings.   His  brushstrokes allow us to see the struggle at the core of every relationship. In separation and reconciliation;  in our wrestling with doubt, guilt, fear; in joyful recognition;  in the choices we make;  in the gifts that we receive; in moments of darkness or quiet fidelity.  Above all  in the face of a loved one, stranger or enemy we discover a glimpse of the God who hides and waits to be found - who understands our longings and our frustrations.

One commentator has written “Like Abraham, Christians are part of an ongoing story. They come in on a conversation that is already taking place; in which something of the character of the main speaker is already evident. And like Abraham, we are aware that our story too will have consequences for those who follow.  Hebrews narrates that the patriarchs do not see the completion of God’s plan, though they see enough to be able to guess and be excited. And they understand enough to be able to live their lives in such a way that they can help generations to come to play their part in their turn. They like Abraham live with this mixture of knowing God through what he has already done and longing to see what is still unknown. Part of what they bequeath to generations to come is that discontent, that restless certainty that what you already know about God and his ways is never enough. Desire and discontent are strange qualities to value but apparently, they are what makes God willing to be identified with us”.

As we struggle at times with being afraid and anxious; of longing for that heavenly city which has still to be fully revealed; and of having faith in those things “hoped  for but not yet seen” may we take confidence in the words of Richard Floyd:-

“In the end it is trust in God’s benevolence towards us that grounds our otherwise ungrounded existence. Grounded in that faith, grounded in the divine benevolence, we can live, not without anxiety, but with faithful courage in the midst of anxiety”.

Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with me (Luke 12:13)

I was struck by the recent headline in one of our national newspapers entitled “Mother left son £300,000 home so he could look after her parrots”.  Some of you may have read it too.  The defender was the sole recipient of his parents’ estate after his mother changed her will in 2019 removing her three stepchildren.  Their father and mother had previously made wills in 2017 splitting all their wealth between their son and their three stepchildren. The defender who has been branded as “pretentious” is being sued by his step-siblings who are trying to force him to split the inheritance he received four ways.

We can, I expect, identify with the unnamed man in the crowd who cries out to Jesus “Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with me”. Although we are not told the exact details, his request does seem reasonable.

How many families have been torn apart by disputes over the terms of a will? I used to come across this as lawyer. Some never spoke to their siblings again. Others resorted to court action especially where there was a large inheritance, a fine country house or an impressive art collection. Often there were issues when a re-marriage had occurred  but the deceased had never got round to altering their original will or other children come along.

The theologian, Jane Williams comments that “The rich man has already decided upon what is important. He has lived his life by that decision. The “judgement” then is one that he has already made.  This is what Jesus wants his listeners to understand. We decide now, day by day, what to value, what to give our heart to. These brothers, fighting over their inheritance, have to come to the Judge of all the earth. They have a chance, now, to listen to Jesus and to choose between the kingdom or allowing the squabble about money to distract them”.

The success of the rich man could be applauded as the faithful application of his God-given capabilities. He has benefited from both the provision of God and his own skilful means. Surely he may be permitted to save up a bit for himself and to celebrate with a feast? Jesus though, is not telling this story to criticise prudent resource management or the celebration of the good things  of life. Instead Jesus, I think, presents the rich man as a type of person who chooses inordinate self-concern over and above the kingdom of God.

Richard Floyd, a pastor from Atlanta, Georgia comments that “As the rich man celebrates the abundance  of his land nowhere does he make mention of others: his family, his friends, his neighbours, his workers, aliens and strangers.  He is supremely isolated. He refuses to participate gratefully and graciously in what God has generously given. It is ironic that, by isolating himself from others in a bid for absolute control, he has in fact lost control and has no one to pass on his abundance”.

Earlier in Luke’s Gospel a lawyer stood up and asked Jesus “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?”. He said “what is written in the law? How do you read? And he answered “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbour as yourself”. And Jesus said to him, “You have answered right, do this and you shall live”.

Genesis 18:20-32

²⁰Then the Lord said, ‘How great is the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah and how very grave their sin! ²¹I must go down and see whether they have done altogether according to the outcry that has come to me; and if not, I will know.’ 22 So the men turned from there, and went towards Sodom, while Abraham remained standing before the Lord. ²³Then Abraham came near and said, ‘Will you indeed sweep away the righteous with the wicked?²⁴Suppose there are fifty righteous within the city; will you then sweep away the place and not forgive it for the fifty righteous who are in it?²⁵Far be it from you to do such a thing, to slay the righteous with the wicked, so that the righteous fare as the wicked! Far be that from you! Shall not the Judge of all the earth do what is just?’ ²⁶And the Lord said, ‘If I find at Sodom fifty righteous in the city, I will forgive the whole place for their sake.’ ²⁷Abraham answered, ‘Let me take it upon myself to speak to the Lord, I who am but dust and ashes. ²⁸Suppose five of the fifty righteous are lacking? Will you destroy the whole city for lack of five?’ And he said, ‘I will not destroy it if I find forty-five there.’ ²⁹Again he spoke to him, ‘Suppose forty are found there.’ He answered, ‘For the sake of forty I will not do it.’ ³⁰Then he said, ‘Oh do not let the Lord be angry if I speak. Suppose thirty are found there.’ He answered, ‘I will not do it, if I find thirty there.’ ³¹He said, ‘Let me take it upon myself to speak to the Lord. Suppose twenty are found there.’ He answered, ‘For the sake of twenty I will not destroy it.’ ³²Then he said, ‘Oh do not let the Lord be angry if I speak just once more. Suppose ten are found there.’ He answered, ‘For the sake of ten I will not destroy it.’

Genesis 18:20-32

“Will you not save the city for the sake of 10 good people?”

Sodom and Gomorrah was a place in uproar. Too many people were having a 'good time’ without a thought for others. Too many were leading lives without thought of God and too many were so hedonistic that they just did what they wanted to do, regardless of how their actions might affect another. It sounds all too familiar to places in the world today and people who think so little of others that they treat them as less than human.

For many centuries it was thought that the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was homosexuality and that was why God destroyed the cities. More recent biblical scholarship has shown this not to be the reason and the reason actually to be the lack of welcome and hospitality shown by the residents of the cities to visitors and strangers.

The residents did not take kindly to the visit of the angels, the young men whom Lot gave hospitality to. They felt threatened by their presence and that their hedonistic lifestyles might be questioned. When they asked Lot to bring the men out so they could ‘know’ them was not to rape them but to murder them! Lot, who knew the value of hospitality - a virtue much expressed in Jewish society - did not want to put his visitors at risk but also wanted to appease the crowd, so he offers the men his daughters instead! Lot wins on one side but falls down spectacularly on another, apparently the rape of his daughters was okay! No wonder God was angry with the residents of Sodom and Gomorrah and no doubt he despaired of Lot as well.

Abraham, who knows much about the weakness of human beings, pleads to God on behalf of the good people in the city and no doubt his relative Lot, that God will no destroy the people if only 10 good people can be found to live there. He bargains well starting with 50 good people and working down! Sadly, not even 10 good people could be found but Lot and his family are warned to leave and not look back.

Society, today needs to heed the lessons of Sodom and Gomorrah. We need to continually ask ourselves how welcoming and hospitable we are as a community to those strangers and needy among us? How welcome are refugees? How welcome are those who are different to us? I wonder what our politicians would say?

Colossians 2:6-19

6 As you therefore have received Christ Jesus the Lord, continue to live your lives in him, ⁷rooted and built up in him and established in the faith, just as you were taught, abounding in thanksgiving. 8 See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the universe, and not according to Christ. ⁹For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, ¹⁰and you have come to fullness in him, who is the head of every ruler and authority. ¹¹In him also you were circumcised with a spiritual circumcision, by putting off the body of the flesh in the circumcision of Christ; ¹²when you were buried with him in baptism, you were also raised with him through faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead. ¹³And when you were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made you alive together with him, when he forgave us all our trespasses, ¹⁴erasing the record that stood against us with its legal demands. He set this aside, nailing it to the cross. ¹⁵He disarmed the rulers and authorities and made a public example of them, triumphing over them in it. 16 Therefore do not let anyone condemn you in matters of food and drink or of observing festivals, new moons, or sabbaths. ¹⁷These are only a shadow of what is to come, but the substance belongs to Christ. ¹⁸Do not let anyone disqualify you, insisting on self-abasement and worship of angels, dwelling on visions, puffed up without cause by a human way of thinking, ¹⁹and not holding fast to the head, from whom the whole body, nourished and held together by its ligaments and sinews, grows with a growth that is from God.

Colossians 2:6-19

This is another bit of one of Paul’s letters where he goes on about circumcision and uncircumcision. He does seem to have a lot to say on the subject which is not surprising as it was by circumcision that the Jews, the chosen people (men) stood out from their neighbours, who did not circumcise. It is, however, not the actual physical process that Paul is referring to in this piece of his writing but the changes in heart and mind one has to make in order to follow God or more explicitly Jesus.

When we choose to follow Christ, Paul implies that we circumcise our hearts, we become changed in some way and live our lives differently. He also implies that it is how we live out the message of the Gospel, the good news and not the mere unquestioning following  of rules and regulations. The latter are traditions that Paul says are secondary to actually trying to live up to a life lived in the light of Christ.

Paul tells us that life in Christ brings about in us a re-birth as our old sins are swept away and we are encouraged and challenged to follow what Jesus did and said and in what he commands us to do and that command is summed up as:

Love God and love thy neighbour as thy self.

Paul implies that we have to try and follow this so called ‘Golden Rule’ in our daily lives and not to be overly influenced or distracted by human ideas and philosophy that might take one away from the path of Christ. Paul implies that human centred philosophies are false paths and will not lead you to eternal life. In many ways this is a hark back to the days of Sodom and Gomorrah when hedonism ruled and people get hurt by the selfishness of others. This Paul suggests is not the life for a Christian.

The challenge before us is how are we to love God and our neighbours and how well do we love ourselves? If we don’t care for ourselves enough we will end up hurting others. Loving oneself is not being selfish but accepting who one is warts and all and deciding to try and live one’s life as well and as good as possible. If we can accept who we are we can find is more easy to accept and love others forgiving them their shortcomings and by doing so we automatically love God because God created all of us, just as we are. God did not make a mistake in you or me, we make mistakes but we need to remember that even when we do so we will still and always be loved beyond measure by God. With that knowledge it becomes easier to love others but it might take a life time to get there.

Luke 11:1-13

The Lord’s Prayer

11He was praying in a certain place, and after he had finished, one of his disciples said to him, ‘Lord, teach us to pray, as John taught his disciples.’ ²He said to them, ‘When you pray, say:
Father, hallowed be your name.
   Your kingdom come. 
³   Give us each day our daily bread. 
⁴   And forgive us our sins,
     for we ourselves forgive everyone indebted to us.
   And do not bring us to the time of trial.’

5 And he said to them, ‘Suppose one of you has a friend, and you go to him at midnight and say to him, “Friend, lend me three loaves of bread;⁶for a friend of mine has arrived, and I have nothing to set before him.”⁷And he answers from within, “Do not bother me; the door has already been locked, and my children are with me in bed; I cannot get up and give you anything.” ⁸I tell you, even though he will not get up and give him anything because he is his friend, at least because of his persistence he will get up and give him whatever he needs. 9 ‘So I say to you, Ask, and it will be given to you; search, and you will find; knock, and the door will be opened for you. ¹⁰For everyone who asks receives, and everyone who searches finds, and for everyone who knocks, the door will be opened. ¹¹Is there anyone among you who, if your child asks for a fish, will give a snake instead of a fish? ¹²Or if the child asks for an egg, will give a scorpion? ¹³If you then, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will the heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!’

Luke 11:1-13

One might wonder when Jesus is asked; ‘How can we pray?’  why he not only teaches us the so called ‘Lord’s Prayer’ but also goes on at length about how we are to treat our friends and family. Is giving bread or eggs a prayer to God? Jesus obviously thinks so and so do I, because Jesus never said anything he did not mean. So when we seek an answer from Jesus as how to pray to God we have to take to heart what he actually says. What I interpret his response as is prayer is not only words but actions and the way you treat others.

Words and actions are important to Jesus. He implies that without the right intentions or desire to love thy neighbour ones words no matter how pious will be empty. Jesus suggests that prayer is living the Gospel. Living the Gospel he also implies is hard because you cannot do it by words alone. If someone is hungry feed them, don’t just pray for them; if someone is lonely visit them don’t just pray for them put you prayers into action.

St.Benedict was inspired by what Jesus had to say about prayer and action and incorporated it into his Rule. Prayer is work and work is prayer, he says and what he means is that if one had dedicated oneself to Christ then all one does is prayer and prayer is fed by actions that help others and build up the common good.

Neither work nor prayer on their own help us to live the Gospel we need both. The residents of Sodom and Gomorrah forgot this and we all know how they ended up!